Formula 1 2026: doubts over electric power, FIA reflects after the first races

Tombazis’ words shake the technical project of the new era

Formula 1 in 2026 was meant to represent the most advanced point of hybrid evolution, a perfect balance between sustainability and performance. Instead, after just a few races, the project is already showing the first cracks. The debate was reignited by Nikolas Tombazis, a key figure in the development of FIA technical regulations, who admitted that the role of electric power may have been overestimated. In addition, FIA Tombazis’ recent statements are influencing discussions among the teams.

A statement that carries enormous weight, because it comes directly from the FIA, the body that strongly wanted a Formula 1 increasingly oriented towards advanced hybrid systems. The concept of 50-50 between the internal combustion engine and electric power, initially seen as the symbol of the sustainable revolution, today appears less solid when tested on track.

The difficulties emerging in the race and the issue of energy management

The first races of the season have highlighted a central problem: managing electric energy is far more complex than expected. The cars are heavily affected by the availability of energy, with phases of the race in which power drops sharply, influencing pace and strategies. It should be noted that FIA Tombazis has also highlighted these difficulties.

In the paddock, the feeling is growing that the system has been pushed beyond the optimal limit. Some drivers have expressed doubts, underlining how driving has become less intuitive and more linked to electronic management than to pure performance. Charles Leclerc has suggested that the current balance does not bring out the feeling with the car, while Lando Norris has highlighted how the behaviour of the cars changes significantly depending on the state of the battery, making it difficult to maintain consistency.

The teams are also working hard to adapt, but the complexity of the system seems to be creating a gap between simulation and reality, with direct effects on the quality of the spectacle.

The FIA evaluates possible changes to the regulations

Tombazis’ statements are not just a technical analysis, but concretely open up the possibility of regulatory action. The FIA is gathering data and feedback to understand whether it is necessary to review the balance between the electric and thermal components. In fact, FIA Tombazis is involved in monitoring possible regulatory changes.

The aim is clear: to avoid Formula 1 losing its identity, turning into a competition too dependent on energy dynamics that are difficult for the public to understand. Sustainability remains a pillar, but it cannot compromise spectacle and competitiveness.

A delicate balance between innovation and spectacle

The issue of electric power in Formula 1 2026 goes beyond the purely technical aspect and is part of a broader context. In recent years, the category has embarked on an ambitious path towards carbon neutrality, while trying to maintain its role as a technological laboratory.

However, the risk is that of moving away from the essence of Formula 1, made up of speed, instinct and on-track duels. The drivers are asking for cars that are more predictable and less tied to energy management, while fans want hard-fought and understandable races. In spite of everything, FIA Tombazis will have to continue to ensure innovation and spectacle.

The future of Formula 1 goes through the next races

The next rounds of the championship will be decisive in understanding whether the current issues are simply teething problems or signs of a deeper mistake. The FIA, the teams and the drivers are called upon to find a balance that allows Formula 1 to evolve without losing its soul.

The feeling is that the debate is only just beginning. And once again it will be the track, more than any statement, that indicates the direction to follow.